Part of the press release reads:
Kudos to Borders and CAIR for getting this mess cleaned up. Now we can move on to more pressing issues.“I regret being pulled into this issue because I never had the intention of targeting Indiana’s Muslim constituents specifically,” said Rep. Borders. “I believe all Americans have the right to freedom of religion and that Muslims should not be targeted for discriminatory measures.”
“We welcome the opportunity for open dialogue and are happy to help Representative Borders clear the air on the issue of the reported anti-Sharia bill,” said Rehab.
Rehab noted that current legislation ensures the supremacy of federal and state laws and that an anti-Sharia bill would have been redundant.
As far as the issue of using foreign law as precedent in state or federal courts, I 100% agree that we should not. That's actually a very mainstream position. It's only people on the far, far left who think that we should do that.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like there was just a mix-up on what Borders was saying.
The way the original article described it made it sound like it was singling out Sharia specifically. I'd actually have no problem with a prohibition on foreign law in general.
ReplyDelete