So is this standard practice at The Star? Publish a half-assed article and then expand it by several paragraphs later in the day? What happened to the days where a copy editor would catch oversights like this, or an editor to look over and notice that half of the people interviewed for the article aren't quoted?
Levin says that the article didn't appear in the print edition at all. I wouldn't know. I broke my Star habit about two years ago.